The US embassy in London says the initial plan to move and finance a new building was a Bush decisionTagged with: #world
January 13, 2018 12:38 pm
The US embassy in London has responded to US President Donald Trump after he claimed the move to a new location in Battersea was a “bad deal.”
On Friday, President Trump said he did not plan to visit the UK for the opening of the new £750 million US embassy.
Mr Trump blamed the cancelled visit on the “off location” of the new embassy, which is moving from Grosvenor Square in Mayfair to Nine Elms, south of the Thames.
He falsely claimed the embassy was sold for “peanuts” in a poor deal negotiated by his predecessor Obama’s administration.
On Friday evening, a US embassy spokesman hit back at the President’s claims and said the plan to finance the project was developed in 2007, at a time when George W. Bush was in the White House.
“The US chancery in Grosvenor Square had aged beyond its ability to be improved to current security and life safety standards without extensive investment in infrastructure that would require appropriated dollars,” he said.
“In 2007, the department developed a plan to finance a new embassy project through a property swap for existing US government property in London.
“This solution allowed construction of a new chancery that meets all security standards, yet used no taxpayer dollars to fund the project.”
The spokesman said the budget was approximately one billion dollars (£730 million) and includes the site purchase, design, and construction costs.
He added: “The project has been executed within the established budget. The search for a new embassy site in London considered more than 50 sites.
“A multi-disciplinary team of professionals considered over 170 criteria, to include physical security requirements, and determined that the Nine Elms site was the best overall location for the US government.
“The new embassy in Nine Elms is one of the most secure, hi-tech, and environmentally-friendly embassies the United States has ever built.
“We are strongly committed in the special relationship between our two countries and we are confident the new embassy will provide the necessary platform to continue our cooperation.”
Mr Trump’s tweet which sparked the row read: “Reason I cancelled my trip to London is that I am not a big fan of the Obama Administration having sold perhaps the best located and finest embassy in London for ‘peanuts,’ only to build a new one in an off location for 1.2 billion dollars.
Sadiq Khan said the US president had “got the message” from Londoners and would have been met by “mass peaceful protests” if he went ahead with plans to open the new embassy.
His comments sparked criticism from Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, who accused the Mayor of London of endangering the so-called “special relationship.”
There was initially confusion as Downing Street was unable to say whether the Foreign Secretary was speaking for the Government when he said Mr Khan and Jeremy Corbyn were putting the “crucial relationship at risk.”
A Number 10 source said: “Boris expresses himself in his own inimitable way, but we agree that any risk to the crucial US-UK relationship is not in our country’s best interests.”
A Downing Street spokesman said Mrs May would tell Mr Trump he is welcome in London.
Asked about the PM’s views on south London after the president described the embassy’s new site as an “off location”, the Number 10 spokesman said: “I think Vauxhall is a vibrant and important part of London and home to many businesses. Obviously Apple are moving their headquarters there.”
The spokesman added: “A state visit (invitation) has been extended and accepted and we will confirm the details in due course.world
Categorised in: World Headlines
This post was written by The Matter of information